The ethical implications of using artificial intelligence to manipulate or enhance natural ecosystems and biodiversity
PDF (English)

Palabras clave

Inteligencia artificial
Ecosistemas naturales
Biodiversidad
Impacto ambiental
Principio de precaución

Cómo citar

Ukpaka, P. (2025). The ethical implications of using artificial intelligence to manipulate or enhance natural ecosystems and biodiversity. Bioética UNAM, (1). https://doi.org/10.22201/pub.bioeticaunam.2024.1.6

Resumen

In light of the grave threats posed to biodiversity and natural ecosystems by human activity, artificial intelligence (AI) emerges as a potent and promising instrument for their preservation. However, it is imperative to acknowledge the concomitant risks and uncertainties associated with AI. The integration of AI into ecological systems may potentially disrupt the intricate balance and integrity of these ecosystems, adversely impacting the rights and interests of diverse stakeholders, and resulting in unanticipated, permanent effects on the continuity of life as we know it. In this work, I discuss the ethical issues involved in utilizing AI to control or improve natural ecosystems and biodiversity by referencing five literature-based arguments. These arguments include the following: loss of authenticity, justice and equity, long-term effects, environmental impact, and ethical duty. I contend that the ethical question of using AI to manage ecosystems and conserve biodiversity is intricate and varied, necessitating a thoughtful and nuanced approach. To establish a moral framework for the responsible use of AI to improve biodiversity, the precautionary principle was investigated and its shortcomings examined. Based on Unesco's four AI integration principles, the "Ecosystem-Centric ai Ethical Framework" was developed as a potential framework to deal with these problems. According to this paradigm, AI should protect human rights and dignity as well as the rights of nature. It should also be monitored and evaluated, and there should be procedures for accountability and redress in the event of harmful effects.
https://doi.org/10.22201/pub.bioeticaunam.2024.1.6
PDF (English)

Citas

Bennett, E. M., Solan, M., Biggs, R., McPhearson, T., Norström, A. V., Olsson, P., et al. 2016. “Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene”, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14 (8): 441-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1309

Bostrom, N. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Boucher, P. 2019. How artificial intelligence works. EPRS-European Parliamentary Research Service, In: European Parliament. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/files/be-heard/religious-and-non-confessional-dialogue/events/en-20190319-how-artificial-intelligence-works.pdf

Cristian. 2024. “AI and the art of garden design: designing your dream garden”, HomeDesignsAI, February 13, 2024. Available at: https://homedesigns.ai/go/ai-and-the-art-of-garden-design-designing-your-dream-garden/

Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio E., Ngo H. T., Guèze M., Agard, J. et al. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat: Bonn, Germany, 22-47. Available at: https://files.ipbes.net/ipbes-web-prod-public-files/downloads/spm_unedited_advance_for_posting_htn.pdf

Dietterich, T. G. 2017. “Steps toward robust artificial intelligence”. AI Magazine 38 (3): 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2756

Elliot, R. 2008. Faking Nature. The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. Routledge.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V. et al. 2018. “AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations”. Minds and Machines 28 (4): 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Geary, W. L., Bode, M., Doherty, T. S., Fulton, E. A., Nimmo, D. G., Tulloch, A. I., et al. 2020. “A guide to ecosystem models and their environmental applications”. Nature Ecology & Evolution 4 (11): 1459-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01298-8

Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C. and Fry, G. 2007. “The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?” Landscape ecology 22 (7): 959-972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x

IPBES. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, and H. T. Ngo (editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 1148 pages. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673

Jamieson, D. 2014. Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed--and What It Means for Our Future. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337668.001.0001

Jensen, D. 2020. “How artificial intelligence is helping tackle environmental challenges”. United Nations Environment Programme. Available at. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/how-artificial-intelligence-helping-tackle-environmental-challenges

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E. 2019. “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines”. Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (9): 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

Jin, H., Xu, J., Peng, Y., Xin, J., Peng, N., Li, Y., Huang J. 2023. “Impacts of landscape patterns on plant species diversity at a global scale”. Science of The Total Environment 896: 165193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165193

Lele, S., Springate-Baginski, O., Lakerveld, R., Deb, D., Dash, P. 2013. “Ecosystem services: origins, contributions, pitfalls, and alternatives”. Conservation & Society 11 (4): 343-358. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26393131

Leopold, A. 1986. A Sand County Almanac: With essays on Conservation from Round River. Ballantine Books.

Ligozat, A. L., Lefevre, J., Bugeau, A., Combaz, J. 2022. “Unraveling the hidden environmental impacts of AI solutions for environment life cycle assessment of AI solutions”. Sustainability 14 (9): 5172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095172

Palmer, C. 2011. “Does Nature Matter? The Place of the Non-human in the Ethics of Climate Change”, in The Ethics of Global Climate Change, edited by Denis G. Arnold, 272-91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Portuese, A., Pillot, J. 2018. “The case for an innovation principle: a comparative law and economic analysis”. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 15 (2): 214-237.

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Rolston III, H. 2012. A New Environmental Ethics: The Next Millennium for Life on Earth. Oxford: Routledge.

Russell, S. J., Norvig, P. eds. 2010. Artificial intelligence a modern approach. Prentice Hall.

Sandin, P. 1999. “Dimensions of the precautionary principle”. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 5 (5): 889-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039991289185

Scheffers, B. R., De Meester, L., Bridge, T. C., Hoffmann, A. A., Pandolfi, J. M., Corlett, R. T., et al. 2016. “The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people”, Science, 354 (6313): aaf7671. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7671

Stahl, B. C. 2021. Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future: An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9

Sunstein, C. R. 2007. “The catastrophic harm precautionary principle”. Issues in Legal Scholarship, 6 (3): 1-31.

Sunstein, C. 2009. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

United Nations. 2015. “Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2024 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México